Authors’ Guidelines for PICMET Papers
Dundar F. Kocaoglu1,
Ann White1, Ann Burgmeyer2
1Portland State University, Engineering and Technology Management
Dept., Portland, OR 97207 USA
2IEEE, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
-
Title block should be centered.
-
For one author, the name should be on one line and
address should be on the next line, all centered under the title block.
-
For multiple authors with the same address, all
names should be listed on one line, then the common address should be
given on the next line, all centered under the title block.
-
For multiple authors with different addresses, all
names should be given on one line with a superscript. The addresses
should be given on one line each, with corresponding superscripts. All
should be centered under the title block.
Back to top
-
The abstract should be a brief synopsis of the
paper, no longer than 200 words
-
References should not be cited in the abstract.
Back to top
-
Figure captions should be below the figures.
-
Table captions should be above the tables.
-
Placing figures and tables before their first
mention in the text should be avoided.
-
The abbreviation “Fig. 1” should be used even at
the beginning of a sentence.
Back to top
-
Equations should be numbered consecutively with
equation numbers in parentheses.
-
Roman symbols for quantities and variables should
be italicized, but not the Greek symbols.
-
Parentheses and brackets should be used, as
appropriate, to avoid ambiguities
-
The symbols used in an equation should be defined
either before the equation appears or immediately after.
-
Reference to an equation should be made by using
“(1),” not “Eq. (1)” or “equation (1),” except at the beginning of a
sentence: “Equation (1) is…”
Back to top
-
Abbreviations and acronyms should be defined the
first time they are used in the text, even after they have been defined
in the abstract.
-
Only a few unambiguous abbreviations such as PICMET,
IEEE, USA and MOT do not have to be defined.
-
Abbreviations should not be used in the title
unless it is unavoidable.
Back to top
-
Use of Roman numerals (I, II, III, IV, etc.) to
number the section headings is optional. If you do use them, number all
sections except “Abstract”, “Acknowledgment” and “References”, and begin
subheadings with letters.
Back to top
-
Try to avoid the stilted expression,
“One of us (R.B.G.) thanks...” should be avoided. Instead, try “R.B.G.
thanks...”
-
The preferred spelling of the word
“acknowledgment” is without an “e” after the “g.”
-
The word “data” is plural, not
singular.
-
The subscript for the Null Hypothesis
is zero, not a lowercase letter “o.”
-
There is no period after the “et” in
the Latin abbreviation “et al.”
-
The abbreviation “i.e.” means “that
is,” and the abbreviation “e.g.” means “for example.”
-
Periods and commas are used within
quotation marks, like “this period.”
-
A parenthetical statement at the end
of a sentence is punctuated outside of the closing parenthesis (like
this).
-
(A parenthetical sentence is
punctuated within the parentheses.)
-
A graph within a graph is an “inset,”
not an “insert.”
-
The word “alternatively” is preferred
to the word “alternately” (unless you really mean something that
alternates).
-
Do not use the word “essentially” to
mean “approximately” or “effectively.”
-
Avoid dangling participles, such as,
“Using (1), the potential was calculated.” Write instead, “The
potential was calculated using (1),” or “Using (1), we calculated the
potential.”
-
Use a zero before decimal points:
“0.25,” not “.25.”
-
Do not confuse “imply” and “infer.”
-
Be aware of the different meanings of
the homophones “affect” and “effect,” “complement” and “compliment,”
“discreet” and “discrete,” “principal” and “principle.”
-
An excellent style manual and source
of information for science writers is “M. Young, The Technical Writer’s
Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.”
Back to top
-
Footnotes should be numbered separately in
superscripts.
-
The actual footnote should be placed at the bottom
of the page in which it is cited. (Do not put footnotes in the reference
list).
-
It
is better to avoid footnotes as much as possible. Instead, try
integrating the footnote information into the text
Back to top
-
Each reference should be
cited with a numerical reference in square brackets, such as [23], when
it appears in the text.
-
The numerical sequence
should be the alphabetical order of the last name of the first author.
-
The sentence punctuation should follow the brackets
as shown here: “[18].”
-
Citations should simply refer to the reference number, as in [15]. (Do
not use “Ref. [15]” or “reference [15]” except at the beginning of a
sentence: “Reference [13] was the first...”)
-
All of the sources cited
in the paper should be included in the list of references.
-
The non-cited sources
should not be listed except when they are included in a separate list
titled “References not cited”.
-
All authors’ names should be given in the
references (do not use “et al.” unless there are six or more authors).
-
Only the first word in a paper title and subtitle,
except for proper nouns, should be capitalized.
-
Papers that have not been published, even if they
have been submitted for publication, should be cited as “unpublished.”
-
Papers that have been accepted for publication
should be cited as “in press.”
-
Working papers should be cited as “working papers.”
Back to top
[1] P. S. Adler, “Managing DFM: Learning to
coordinate product and process design,” in Integrating Design and
Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage, G. I. Susman, Ed. New York:
Oxford, 1992.
[2] T. J. Allen, “Studies of problem-solving
process in engineering design,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Management, vol.
13, pp. 72-83, 1966.
[3]
S.Ewton, “E-Business Strategies,” unpublished.
[4] F. A. Ghisi, A. B. Noronha and T. Pimenta,
Jr. , “The information technology and the critical success factors”,
Retrieved 2/15/03 World Wide Web, http://www.picmet.org/bulletin.pdf
[5] B.C. Iyengar and A.D. Harris,
"Innovative approaches to the management of software development
projects," in Papers presented at PICMET'99 [CD-ROM], eds.: D.F.
Kocaoglu, T.R. Anderson, D.Z. Milosevic, K. Niwa and H. Tschirky,
Portland, OR: PICMET, July 1999.
[6] R.
Nicole, “European and Asian approaches to technology management: A
comparative analysis ,” Intl. J. of Technol. Mgmt., in press.
[7] J. K. Pinto and D. P. Slevin, “Critical
success factors in R&D projects,” Res. Technol. Management, pp.
30-35, Jan./Feb. 1989.
[8] S. Sanderson and V. Uzumeri, “Strategies
for new product development and renewal: design-based incrementalism,”
Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., Center for Sci. and Technol. Policy,
working paper, May 1990.
[9] M. Young, The Technical Writer’s
Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.
(Note that
[1] is a chapter in a book, [2] is a paper in a journal with full
information about the volume, pages and year, [3] is an unpublished paper,
[4] is retrieved from World Wide Web on 2/15/02, [5] is from a CD, [6] is
a paper that will appear in a journal, [7] is a paper in a journal which
does not have a Volume number, [8] is a working paper, and [9] is a book.)
|